U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2002
I. Basic Information
In compliance with the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments
of 1996, the Department of State submits the attached report on the Freedom
of Information Act program. This report addresses the time period for
the 2002 fiscal year (October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002). Questions
pertaining to this report may be addressed to:
Alice S. Ritchie
Chief, Information Lifecycle Management Branch
Office of Information Programs and Services
A/RPS/IPS/PP/LC, SA-2, Room 4025
U.S. Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20520-6001
Telephone: (202) 261-8511
Fax: (202) 261-8571
This report is available on our web site at http://www.foia.state.gov .
Paper copies may be requested by contacting A/RPS/IPS at the above address.
II. How to Make A FOIA Request
Freedom of Information Act requests must be made in writing and submitted
by mail or fax (not e-mail) to the Office of Information Programs and
Services (IPS) at the address indicated. Requesters must describe the
records sought as clearly and precisely as possible, and state their willingness
to pay applicable fees or provide justification to support a fee waiver.
Requesters should clearly mark their request "Freedom of Information Act
Request" and include a daytime telephone number at which they may be reached.
In order for a request to be processed, it must be "perfected." A request
is deemed not perfected when unresolved issues exist, such as when the
records sought have not been reasonably described or there are unresolved
fee issues. IPS staff will notify the requester of any deficiencies of
the request, and advise the requester how to perfect the request.
The Department will respond to requests within 20 working days of receipt,
advising the requester of the date of receipt, the case number assigned
to the request, and whether or not the records sought are under the Department's
control. Whenever possible, the request will be processed within 20 working
days. It is the Department's policy to release information to the maximum
extent possible. However, if some information must be withheld, the requester
will be notified of the amount of information withheld, the
basis for the withholding and the procedures for appealing the
withholding. For more information on making a FOIA request, you
may visit our web site at http://www.foia.state.gov or
contact IPS at the address indicated.
III. Definitions of Terms and Acronyms Used in the
Report
A. Agency-Specific Terms
1. A/RPS/IPS -- Deputy Assistant Secretary for Records
and Publishing Services, Office of Information Resources Management
Programs and Services
B. Basic Terms
1. FOIA/PA request -- Freedom of Information Act/Privacy
Act request. A FOIA request is generally a request for access
to records concerning a third party, an organization, or a particular
topic of interest. A Privacy Act request is a request for records
concerning oneself; such requests are also treated as FOIA requests
to afford maximum access. (All requests for access to records,
regardless of which law is cited by the requester, are included
in this report.)
2. Initial Request -- a request to a federal agency
for access to records under the Freedom of Information Act.
3. Appeal -- a request to a federal agency asking
that it review at a higher administrative level a full denial
or partial denial of access to records under the Freedom of Information
Act, or any other FOIA determination such as a matter pertaining
to fees.
4. Processed Request or Appeal -- a request or appeal
for which an agency has taken a final action on the request or
the appeal in all respects.
5. Multi-track processing -- a system in which simple
requests requiring relatively minimal review are placed in one
processing track, and more voluminous and complex requests are
placed in one or more other tracks. Requests in each track are
processed on a first-in/first-out basis. A requester who has
an urgent need for records may request expedited processing (see
below).
6. Expedited Processing -- an agency will process
a FOIA request on an expedited basis when a requester has shown
an exceptional need or urgency for the records which warrants
prioritization of his or her request over other requests that
were made earlier.
7. Simple Request -- a FOIA request that an agency
using multi-track processing places in its fastest (non-expedited)
track based on the volume and/or simplicity of records requested.
8. Complex Request -- a FOIA request that an agency
using multi-track processing places in a slower track based on
the volume and/or complexity of records requested.
9. Grant -- an agency decision to disclose all records
in full in response to a FOIA request.
10. Partial Grant -- an agency decision to disclose
a record in part in response to a FOIA request, deleting information
determined to be exempt under one or more of the FOIA's exemptions;
or a decision to disclose some records in their entireties, but
to withhold others in whole or in part.
11. Denial -- an agency decision not to release any
part of a record or records in response to a FOIA request because
all the information in the requested records is determined by
the agency to be exempt under one or more of the FOIA's exemptions,
or for some procedural reason (such as - no record is located
in response to a FOIA request).
12. Time Limits -- the time period in the Freedom of
Information Act for an agency to respond to a FOIA request (ordinarily
20 working days from proper receipt of a "perfected" FOIA request).
13. "Perfected" Request -- a FOIA request for records
which adequately describes the records sought, which has been
received by the FOIA office of the agency or agency component
in possession of the records, and for which there is no remaining
question about the payment of applicable fees.
14. Exemption 3 Statute -- a separate federal statute
prohibiting the disclosure of a certain type of information and
authorizing its withholding under FOIA subsection (b)(3).
15. Median Number -- the middle, not average, number.
For example, of 3, 7, and 14, the median number is 7.
16. Average Number -- the number obtained by dividing
the sum of a group of numbers by the quantity of numbers in the
group. For example, of 3, 7, and 14 the average number is 8.
IV. Exemption 3 Statutes
| Statute
Cited |
Description
of Type of Information Withheld |
Has
Use of the Statute Been Upheld in Court? |
| 8 USC 1202(f) |
Protects records pertaining
to the issuance or refusal of visas to enter the United
States |
Medina-Hincapie v. U.S. Department
of State Docket #82-1202 (D.C. Cir Feb 25, 1983) |
| 10 USC 424 |
Protects organizational and
personnel information for Defense Intelligence Agency,
National Reconnaissance Office, and National Imagery and
Mapping Agency |
No |
| 22 USC 2778 |
Protects information concerning
arms export licensing cases |
Council for a Livable World
v. U.S. Department of State Docket #96-1807 (D.D.C. Nov. 23,1998) |
| 42 USC 2011 |
Protects records defining policy
for the development, use and control of atomic and nuclear
energy in private, peaceful and military matters |
No |
| 50 USC 403-3(c)(6) |
Protects material regarding
nature of agency functions; prohibits release of documents
that would endanger the intelligence gathering process |
Agee v. CIA Docket #79-2788 (D.D.C. 11/3/82) |
50 USC App. 2411
(c)(1) |
Protects confidential
information concerning the licensing procedure under the Export Administration Act |
Africa Fund v. Mosbacher Docket #92-289 (S.D.N.Y. 5/26/93) |
V. Initial FOIA/PA Access Requests
N.B. Statistics reported herein are based
on data currently available and are accurate to the extent possible.
However, not all data required to prepare this report are currently
being collected in the Department's requests tracking system.
For example, statistics for the medians (section VII) are based
on the dates that acknowledgement letters were sent to requesters,
and in some cases the dates that requests were received, not
on the dates when the requests were perfected (and thus processable)
or when expeditious processing was granted. An asterisk (as in
section B. 4) indicates that data were not collected in a particular
category and, therefore, no statistics are available. Lastly,
the Department processes requests incrementally, i.e., segments
of a case are processed as they become available. Requests in
which there have been incremental releases, but which have not
been processed to completion are not reflected in this report.
Time is reported in calendar days.
A. Numbers of Initial Requests.
1. |
Number of requests pending as of end of
preceding fiscal year |
* 6845 |
2. |
Number of requests received during current
fiscal year |
3134 |
3. |
Number of requests processed during current
fiscal year |
4636 |
4. |
Number of requests pending as of end of current fiscal
year |
5343 |
|
* Due to a change in the tracking of
non-perfected/perfected requests, this number does not
correspond to the number of cases pending in the 2001 Annual
Report. |
B. Disposition of Initial Requests.
1. |
Number of total grants |
634 |
2. |
Number of partial grants |
818 |
3. |
Number of denials |
104 |
a.
Number of times each FOIA exemption used
Exemption 1 |
496 |
Exemption 2 |
49 |
Exemption 3 |
152 |
Exemption 4 |
51 |
Exemption 5 |
201 |
Exemption 6 |
324 |
Exemption 7 (A) |
14 |
Exemption 7 (B) |
3 |
Exemption 7 (C) |
40 |
Exemption 7 (D) |
15 |
Exemption 7 (E) |
30 |
Exemption 7 (F) |
11 |
Exemption 8 |
0 |
Exemption 9 |
0 |
4. Other reasons for nondisclosure (total) 3080
a. no records 963
b. referrals 474
(This statistic reflects cases in which all
documents were referred to another agency
for response and cases in which the request
itself should be directed to another agency.)
c. request withdrawn 31
d. fee-related reason * 0
e. records not reasonably described * 0
f. not a proper FOIA request for some
other reason 21
g. not an agency record * 0
h. duplicate request 71
i. other (specify) 1520
(This statistic reflects requests which were
not perfected.)
* Data not collected.
VI. Appeals of Initial Denials of FOIA/PA Requests
A. Number of appeals
1. Number of appeals received during fiscal year 217
2. Number of appeals processed during fiscal year 184
B. Disposition of Appeals
1. Number completely upheld 43
2. Number partially reversed 115
3. Number completely reversed 11
a. Number of times each FOIA exemption used
Exemption 1 |
121 |
Exemption 2 |
4 |
Exemption 3 |
18 |
Exemption 4 |
7 |
Exemption 5 |
24 |
Exemption 6 |
32 |
Exemption 7 (A) |
1 |
Exemption 7 (B) |
0 |
Exemption 7 (C) |
5 |
Exemption 7 (D) |
2 |
Exemption 7 (E) |
1 |
Exemption 7 (F) |
0 |
Exemption 8 |
0 |
Exemption 9 |
0 |
4. Other reasons for nondisclosure (total) 15
a. no records 6
b. referrals 0
c. request withdrawn 5
d. fee-related reason 0
e. records not reasonably described 0
f. not a proper FOIA request for some other reason 0
g. not an agency record 0
h. duplicate request 0
i. other (specify) 4
1. processed through litigation 3
2. appeal not timely filed 1
VII. Compliance with Time Limits/Status of Pending
Requests
A. In accordance with the amended FOIA, the Department
has established multiple-tracks for processing Freedom of Information
Act requests for the public so as to distinguish simple requests
from complex requests. At this time, requests can be assigned
to one of two tracks, the simple/fast track or the routine/complex
track. Requests are assigned to a particular tracking queue contingent
upon the level of effort required to complete the request, the
number and location of searches/record sources, and the estimated
volume of responsive records. It is often difficult to assign
a case to an appropriate track during the initial processing
stage of a request. Since the Department's search function is
decentralized, the number and complexity of responsive documents
and the amount of other agency concurrences are unknown until
all searches are returned and the review of the documents has
been completed. As a result, movement between tracks can become
very fluid. A seemingly routine case can quickly become complex
as searches are returned with voluminous documents. This type
of case activity blurs the line between routine and complex cases.
Thus, making it impossible to create a complex track under our
current system.
In order to improve response times to new and pending requests
and reduce the existing FOIA backlog, additional resources were
allocated to the Department's Freedom of Information Act program.
The additional resources target the following initiatives:
1) significantly reduce the current FOIA backlog over the next
two years by hiring additional temporary staff; 2) prevent future
backlogs of information requests by constructing a permanent
FOIA workforce infrastructure to keep up with incoming workload;
and 3) reduce the diversion of FOIA staff by constructing a permanent
special project workforce infrastructure.
To accomplish these goals, workforce recruitment efforts have
supplemented our existing staffing resources. Accomplishments
have been made in each of the ongoing efforts. Firstly, nearly
fifty additional retired Senior Foreign Service Officers from
the State Department and the former U.S. Information Agency have
been selected and will serve in a part time temporary capacity
as reviewers. Secondly, additional staff has been specially recruited
from universities in the Washington metropolitan area for the
more time-consuming and labor-intensive support activities inherent
to responding to FOIA requests and other document production
demands. Thirdly, the Department's senior resource managers approved
an additional 23 new full-time permanent positions and the allocation
of an additional $4 million from existing Department appropriations
for a task force of civil service employees and contractors dedicated
to a two-year project known as Due Diligence to address
the existing FOIA backlog. The goal is to reduce the backlog
by 40% each year over the next two years.
Median processing time for FOIA/PA requests processed during
the year:
1. Simple Requests - "Fast Track"
a. number of requests processed 1863
b. median number of days to process 351
2. Routine/Complex Requests
a. number of requests processed 2764
b. median number of days to process 431
3. Requests Accorded Expedited Processing
a. number of requests processed 9
b. median number of days to process 255
B. Status of Pending Requests
1. Number of FOIA/PA requests pending
as of end of current fiscal year 5343
2. Median number of days that such
requests were pending 546
VIII. Comparisons with previous year(s) (Optional)
| |
|
FY 2001 |
FY2002 |
Percentage of Change |
| A. |
Comparison of numbers of requests received |
3761 |
3134 |
16.67% |
decrease |
| B. |
Comparison of numbers of requests processed |
3329 |
4636 |
39.28% |
increase |
| C. |
Comparison of median number of days requests
were pending as of end of fiscal year |
*542 |
546 |
.74% |
increase |
| |
* This figure does not correspond
to the median number of days pending as reported in the 2001
FOIA Annual Report. As part of Due Diligence, cases are being
systematically reviewed and re-evaluated resulting in some
data elements being updated or corrected. As a result, this
figure as calculated for the 2002 report, more accurately
reflects last year's reporting period statistics. |
D. Other statistics significant to Agency:
1. Number of requests for expedited processing 117
2. Number of requests granted expedited processing 10
E. Other Narrative Statements:
1. Training on Court Decision
In accordance with the January 25, 2002, decision by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Department
has established and implemented new cut-off dates for conducting
searches for responsive documents
to existing and new FOIA requests. The Department changed its
standard operating procedures from using the date of the requester's
letter as the cut-off date for searches and review of material
to using the date that searches are initiated. Training sessions
were provided to ensure that all Department FOIA and Privacy
Act officers in the organization as well as those officers conducting
decentralized searches were accurately informed on how to implement
the new decision. In the coming year, the Department intends
to provide quarterly training sessions to communicate updates
to regulations, correct inconsistent practices and discuss other
issues related to FOIA and Privacy Act requests.
2. Public Availability of New Categories of Records
As mandated by the 1996 amendments to the Freedom of Information
Act (E-FOIA), IPS has established a web site on the Internet
located at http://www.foia.state.gov in
part to make new categories of records publicly available. Since
its inception in March 1998, the site has developed into an information-rich
direct source of State Department documents and information.
The site encompasses a continuously growing collection of unique
records of international significance, which have been made available
to the public under the FOIA or as special collections. While
the site averages 3,500 visitors per day, there is a huge increase
in the visits to our website just subsequent to releases of special
document collections of a large global interest, such as, the
750,000 hits seen on the first day that the Argentina collection
was made available on our website. By proactively making declassified
record collections available to the requesting public in our
electronic reading room, we believe we have reduced the amount
of direct FOIA cases received per year. This belief is supported
by the 16% decrease in number of cases received this reporting
period.
Special interest collections currently total over 100,000 pages
in addition to a continually expanding FOIA library of previously
released documents. The c ollections encompass human rights abuses
in countries such as Guatemala from 1984 to 1995, Chile during
the Pinochet era and Argentina from 1975 to 1984. Other topics
include the murders of four U.S. churchwomen in El Salvador;
the disappearance and investigation of Amelia Earhart; and the
disappearance in Hungary of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg
during World War II. A collection about the creation of the OSS
and subsequent establishment of the modern-day CIA has also been
added.
The site also provides a number of aids to help users understand
the content of our records and how to access that information;
how records are reviewed and processed for release; why some
information may continue to be withheld; and
what their appeal rights are. The search engine offers both
standard and advanced search capabilities that include full text
retrieval of the documents on the site. In addition, there are
extensive links to other sites that are sources of State Department
records or information. In general, IPS has applied technology
to enhance performance and increase the level of satisfaction
for our many customers, a customer base that is probably one
of the most comprehensive in the Federal Government, including
the general public, the White House, the Congress, other Federal
agencies, the courts,
academia, historians, journalists, attorneys, private interest
groups, and the Department's offices and overseas posts.
IX. Costs/FOIA Staffing
Data provided in this section reflect only costs and staffing
for the Office of Information Programs and Services (IPS), the
Department's central office for processing FOIA/PA requests.
We are unable at this time to capture data for decentralized
offices or for personnel outside of the Office of Information
Programs and Services who have FOIA/PA duties.
A. Staffing levels
| 1. |
Number of full-time FOIA/PA personnel |
121 |
| 2. |
Number of personnel with part-time or occasional FOIA/PA duties (in work-years) |
37 |
| 3. |
Total number of personnel (in work-years) |
158 * |
B. Totals Costs (including staff and all resources) (estimates)
| 1. |
FOIA/PA processing (including appeals) |
$13,904,439 |
| 2. |
Litigation-related activities |
$91,396 |
| |
Total costs |
$ 13,995,835* |
* These figures represent the
total annual
resource allotment for the Office of Information Programs and
Services (IPS). IPS is the office within the Department of State
which has program responsibility for several statutory and information
management functions in addition to FOIA and Privacy Act implementation. IPS has Department-wide
program responsibilities for records management and archiving
of State Department central foreign policy files, E.O. 12958
on classification/declassification of national security information,
and special document production requests from the President,
Congress, or the courts. In addition to staff costs, other resources
covered by the figure are several information technology systems
that concurrently support multiple functions. These include an
on-line 28 million record archive of electronic diplomatic communications,
a case tracking/imaging/electronic redaction system which supports
information access
case processing, and several Internet and Intranet websites.
As these resources support many interrelated functions, it is
impossible to extrapolate that portion of the costs devoted exclusively
to FOIA and Privacy Act case processing.
C. Statement of Additional Resources Needed
for FOIA/PA Compliance
The Department was granted funds to establish a backlog reduction
project team and to put a permanent workforce in place for special
projects. This made additional full-time-employee staff available
to devote to the FOIA program. If efforts continue to be staffed
and funded, the Department will successfully decrease the backlog
and maintain a more reasonable FOIA response time.
X. Fees
| A. |
Total amount of fees collected for processing requests |
$18,889.39 |
| B. |
Percentage of total costs |
.13% |
XI. FOIA Regulations
The Department's FOIA regulations are located at 22 CFR 171.
These can be found directly at the Government Printing Office's
(GPO) website at http://www.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/index.html or
from links at website at http://foia.state.gov .
The Department's search and review fees are assessed at the
following rates:
Administrative/Clerical
(GS-1 through GS-8; or
FS-9 through FS-6) |
$8.00/hour |
Professional
(GS-9 through GS-13; or
FS-5 through FS-3) |
$17.00/hour |
Executive
(GS-14 and above; or
FS-2 and above) |
$30.00/hour |
|