|
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
STATE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACT
ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR
2004
I. Basic
Information
In compliance with the Freedom of
Information Act Amendments of 1996, the Department of State (hereinafter the "Department") submits the attached report on the Freedom of Information Act
program. This report addresses the time
period for the 2004 fiscal year (October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004). Questions pertaining to this report may be
addressed to:
Margaret
P. Grafeld
Director,
Office of Information Programs and Services
A/RPS/IPS,
SA-2, Room 5073
U.S.
Department of State
Washington,
D.C. 20520
Telephone:
(202) 261-8300
Fax:
(202) 261-8590
This report is available on our
web site at http://www.foia.state.gov. Paper copies may be requested by contacting
A/RPS/IPS at the above address.
II. How to Make
A FOIA Request
Freedom of Information Act
(hereinafter "FOIA") requests to the Department can be made in writing and
submitted by mail to the Office of Information Programs and Services
(hereinafter "IPS") at the address indicated, by fax or via the Department's
FOIA website at foia.state.gov/foiareq/foialetter.asp.
Requesters
must describe the records sought as clearly and precisely as possible, and
state their willingness to pay applicable fees or provide justification to support a fee waiver. Requesters should clearly label
their letter as a "Freedom of
Information Act Request" on the envelope or on the subject line of their fax,
and include a daytime telephone number at which they may be reached. As of August 2004, the Department is
receiving FOIA requests through its FOIA website. The new eFOIA request letter allows the public to easily request
Department of State records. In
addition, the helpful tips provide assistance in formulating the FOIA request.
In order for a request to be processed, it must be "perfected." A request is deemed not
perfected when unresolved issues exist, such as when the records sought have
not been reasonably described or when there are unresolved fee issues. IPS staff will notify the requester of any
deficiencies in the request, and advise the requester how to perfect the
request.
The Department will respond to
requests within 20 working days of receipt, advising the requester of the date
of receipt, the case number assigned to the request, and whether or not the
records sought are under the Department's control. Whenever possible, the request will be processed within 20
working days. The Department's policy
is to release information to the maximum extent possible. However, if some information must be
withheld, the requester will be notified of the amount of information withheld,
the
basis for the withholding and the
procedures for appealing the withholding. For more information on making a FOIA request, you may visit our web
site at http://www.foia.state.gov or
contact IPS at the address indicated.
III. Definitions
of Terms and Acronyms Used in the Report
A. Agency-Specific Terms
1. A/RPS/IPS - Bureau of Administration, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Records and Publishing Services, Office of Information Programs
and Services.
B.Basic Terms from the U.S. Department of Justice ("FOIA
Update," Spring 1997).
1. FOIA/PA request -- Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act
request. A FOIA request is generally a
request for access to records concerning a third party, an organization, or a
particular topic of interest. A Privacy
Act request is a request for records concerning oneself; such requests are also
treated as FOIA requests. (All requests
for access to records, regardless of which law is cited by the requester, are
included in this report.)
2. Initial Request -- a request to a federal agency for access to
records under the Freedom of Information Act.
3. Appeal -- a request to a federal agency asking that it review
at a higher administrative level a full denial or partial denial of access to
records under the Freedom of Information Act, or any other FOIA determination
such as a matter pertaining to fees.
4. Processed Request or Appeal -- a request or appeal for which
an agency has taken a final action on the request or the appeal in all
respects.
5. Multi-track processing -- a system in which simple requests
requiring relatively minimal review are placed in one processing track, and
more voluminous and complex requests are placed in one or more other
tracks. Requests in each track are
processed on a first-in/first-out basis. A requester who has an urgent need for records may request expedited
processing (see below).
6. Expedited Processing -- an agency will process a FOIA request
on an expedited basis when a requester has shown an exceptional need or urgency
for the records which warrants prioritization of his or her request over other
requests that were made earlier.
7.Simple Request -- a FOIA request that an agency using
multi-track processing places in its fastest (non-expedited) track based on the
volume and/or simplicity of records requested.
8. Complex Request -- a FOIA request that an agency using
multi-track processing places in a slower track based on the volume and/or
complexity of records requested.
9. Grant -- an agency decision to disclose all records in full in
response to a FOIA request.
10.
Partial Grant -- an agency decision to disclose a record in
part in response to a FOIA request, deleting information determined to be
exempt under one or more of the FOIA's exemptions; or a decision to disclose
some records in their entireties, but to withhold others in whole or in part.
11.
Denial -- an agency decision not to release any part of a
record or records in response to a FOIA request because all the information in
the requested records is determined by the agency to be exempt under one or
more of the FOIA's exemptions, or for some procedural reason (such as - no
record is located in response to a FOIA request).
12.
Time Limits -- the time period in the Freedom of Information
Act for an agency to respond to a FOIA request (ordinarily 20 working days from
proper receipt of a "perfected" FOIA request).
13. "Perfected" Request -- a FOIA request for records which
adequately describes the records sought, which has been received by the FOIA
office of the agency or agency component in possession of the records, and for
which there is no remaining question about the payment of applicable fees.
14.
Exemption 3 Statute -- a separate federal statute prohibiting
the disclosure of a certain type of information and authorizing its withholding
under FOIA subsection (b)(3).
15.
Median Number -- the middle, not average, number. For example, of 3, 7, and 14, the median
number is 7.
16.
Average Number -- the number obtained by dividing the sum of a
group of numbers by the quantity of numbers in the group. For example, of 3, 7,
and 14 the average number is 8.
IV. Exemption 3
Statutes
|
Statute
Cited
|
Description of Type of Information Withheld
|
Has Use of the Statute Been Upheld in
Court?
|
| 5 U.S.C. App.3, § 7(b) |
Protects the identity of employees who provide a complaint
or information to the Inspector General
|
No
|
| 8 U.S.C. § 1202(f) |
Protects records pertaining to the issuance or refusal of
visas to enter the United States
|
Medina-Hincapie
v. U.S. Department of State 700 F.2d 737
(D.C. Cir. 1983)
|
| 10 U.S.C. § 424 |
Protects organizational and personnel information for
Defense Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, and National
Imagery and Mapping Agency
|
No
|
| 22 U.S.C. § 2778 |
Protects information concerning arms export licensing
cases
|
Council for a Livable World Education Fund v. U.S.
Department of State Docket #96-1807
(D.D.C. Nov.
23,1998)
|
| 22 U.S.C. § 4004 |
Protects Foreign Service employee records
|
No
|
| 26 U.S.C. § 6103 |
Income Tax Act - protects tax returns |
Church of
Scientology v. IRS, 484 U.S. 9 (1987)
|
42 U.S.C. § 2011
|
Protects records defining policy for the development, use
and control of atomic and nuclear energy in private, peaceful and military
matters
|
No
|
50 U.S.C. § 402
note sec. 6
|
Information regarding National Security Agency activities
and personnel
|
Church of Scientology v. NSA, 610 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
|
| 50 U.S.C. § 403-g |
Protects the nature of the CIA's
functions and personnel under the Central Intelligence Agency Act
|
Minier v. CIA 88 F. 3d 796
(9th
Cir. 1996)
|
| 50 U.S.C. § 403-3(c)(7) |
Protects intelligence sources and
methods under the National Security Act
|
Sims v. CIA 471 U.S. 159 (1985)
|
|
50 U.S.C. App. 2411 (c)(1)
|
Protects confidential information
concerning the licensing procedure under the Export Administration Act
|
Africa Fund v. Mosbacher
Docket #92-289
(S.D.N.Y. 5/26/93) |
| 50 U.S.C. § 1701- note |
Protects records on arbitration of claims before the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal
|
No
|
V. Initial
FOIA/PA Access Requests
N.B. Statistics
reported herein are based on data currently available and are accurate to the
extent possible. However, not all data
required to prepare this report are currently being collected in the
Department's requests tracking system.
For example, statistics for the medians (section VII) are based on the
dates that acknowledgement letters were sent to requesters, and in some cases
the dates that requests were received, not on the dates when the requests were
perfected (and thus processable) or when expeditious processing was
granted. An asterisk (as in section B.
4) indicates additional information concerning the data provided. Lastly, the Department processes requests
incrementally, i.e. segments of a case are processed as they become
available. Requests in which there have
been incremental releases, but which have not been processed to completion are
not reflected in this report. Time is
reported in calendar days.
A. Numbers of Initial Requests.
1.
Number of requests pending as of end of preceding fiscal year 3008
2. Number of requests received during current fiscal year 3951
3.
Number of requests processed during current 4963
4.
Number of requests pending as of end of current fiscal year 1996
B. Disposition
of Initial Requests.
1. Number of total grants 837
2. Number of partial grants 1370
3. Number of denials 345
a. Number of times each FOIA exemption used
|
Exemption 1
|
762
|
|
Exemption 2
|
138
|
|
Exemption 3 |
485
|
| Exemption 4
|
126
|
| Exemption 5
|
377
|
|
Exemption 6
|
624
|
| Exemption 7 (A)
|
39
|
|
Exemption 7 (B)
|
2
|
| Exemption 7 (C)
|
121
|
| Exemption 7 (D)
|
27
|
| Exemption 7 (E)
|
50
|
| Exemption 7 (F)
|
8
|
|
Exemption 8
|
0
|
| Exemption 9
|
0
|
4. Other reasons for nondisclosure (total) 2411
a. no records 758
b. referrals 438 (This statistic reflects cases in which all
documents were referred to another agency for response and cases in
which the request itself should be directed to another agency.)
c.
request withdrawn 50
d. fee-related reason* 0
e. records not reasonably described* 0
f. not a proper FOIA request for some other reason 81
g. not an agency record* 0
h.
duplicate request 34
i. other (specify) 1050
(This statistic reflects requests which were not perfected or administratively closed.)
*Data not collected.
VI. Appeals of
Initial Denials of FOIA/PA Requests
A. Number
of appeals
1.
Number of appeals received during fiscal year 368
2.
Number of appeals processed during fiscal year 294
B.
Disposition of Appeals
1. Number completely upheld 100
2. Number partially reversed 165
3. Number completely reversed 9
a. Number of times each FOIA exemption used
|
Exemption 1
|
197
|
Exemption 2
|
9
|
Exemption 3
|
39
|
Exemption 4
|
10
|
Exemption 5
|
78
|
Exemption 6
|
69
|
Exemption 7 (A)
|
7
|
Exemption 7 (B)
|
1
|
Exemption 7 (C)
|
10
|
Exemption 7 (D)
|
5
|
Exemption 7 (E)
|
3
|
Exemption 7 (F)
|
2
|
Exemption 8
|
0
|
|
Exemption 9
|
0
|
4. Other reasons for nondisclosure (total) 20
a. no records 11
b. referrals 0
c. request withdrawn 4
d. fee-related reason 0
e. records not reasonably described 0
f. not a proper FOIA request for some other
reason 0
g. not an agency record 0
h. duplicate request 1
i. other (specify) 4
1. appeal overtaken
by litigation: 1
2. appeal of other
agency documents: 2
3. document under appeal was determined to be non-relevant: 1
VII. Compliance with Time Limits/Status of Pending Requests
A.
In accordance with the amended FOIA, the Department has established
multiple-tracks for processing FOIA requests for the public so as to
distinguish simple requests from complex requests. At this time, requests can be assigned to one of two tracks, the
simple/fast track or the routine/complex track. Requests are assigned to a particular tracking queue contingent
upon the level of effort required to complete the request, the number and
location of searches/record sources, and the estimated volume of responsive
records. Assigning a case to an
appropriate track is often difficult during the initial processing stage of a
request. Since the Department's search
function is decentralized, the number and complexity of responsive documents
and the amount of other agency concurrences are unknown until all searches are
returned and the review of the documents has been completed. As a result, movement between tracks can
become very fluid. A seemingly routine
case can quickly become complex as searches are returned with voluminous
documents. This type of case activity
blurs the line between routine and complex cases, thus, making it impossible to
break out the complex track under our current
system.
As reported last year,
in order to improve response times to new and pending requests and reduce the
existing FOIA backlog, additional resources were allocated to the Department's
FOIA program for a two-year period.
This year the IPS task force, Operation Due Diligence, has completed its
FOIA backlog reduction project. The
team surpassed its goal of closing 80% of all cases. Over the two-year project cycle, more than 11,500 requests have
been completed representing a closure rate of 85%. We have reduced the overall FOIA backlog from 6,214 to fewer than
2,000 cases. The median processing time
has decreased by 65% over the last two years.
We are confident that the "lessons learned" will enable the Department
to keep up with the incoming workload and prevent future backlogs of FOIA
requests.
IPS continues to target the following initiatives: 1) reduce
the remaining FOIA backlog; 2) prevent future backlogs of information
requests by constructing a permanent FOIA workforce infrastructure to keep up
with the incoming workload; and 3) identify areas in which procedural improvements can be made and
implement process improvements to streamline the FOIA process.
Median processing time for FOIA/PA requests processed during
the year:
1.
Simple Requests - "Fast Track"
a. number of requests processed 1236
b. median number of days to process 6
2.
Routine/Complex Requests
a. number of requests processed 3710
b. median number of days to process 209
3.
Requests Accorded Expedited Processing
a. number of requests processed 17
b. median number of days to process 184
B. Status of Pending Requests
1.
Number of FOIA/PA requests pending as of end of current fiscal year 1996
2. Median number of days that such requests were pending 189
VIII. Comparisons with previous year(s) (Optional)
| |
FY2003 |
FY 2004 |
Percentage of Change |
| A. Comparison of numbers of requests received |
3438 |
3951 |
14.9% increase |
| B. Comparison of numbers of requests processed |
5773 |
4963 |
14.0% decrease** |
| C. Comparison of median number of days requests were pending as of end of fiscal year |
312 |
189 |
39.4% decrease |
*This
figure also includes cases re-opened in FY 2004.
**The
14% decrease in requests processed is a direct result of the completion of the
intense two-year backlog reduction effort of Operation Due Diligence. May we note that this remains a 10% increase
in requests processed over FY2002.
D. Other statistics significant to Agency:
1. Number of requests for expedited processing 95
2. Number of requests granted expedited processing 8
E. Other Narrative Statements:
1. Training
IPS provides ongoing training for
both new employees and IPS staff.
Training continues to cover the FOIA amendment (P.L. 107-306) exempting
intelligence communities from releasing information to foreign governments. Training
also allows for discussion of
procedural issues pertaining to FOIA and the implementation of E.O. 12958, and
provides guidance on new rules and directives.
Also covered are new court decisions and their effect on the
Department's FOIA program.
We continue to recruit students
from local colleges and universities to provide support in response to FOIA and
other document production demands. The
students are provided training in the various phases of FOIA and are encouraged
to remain as permanent employees after graduation, ensuring a continuous FOIA
infrastructure.
2. Public Availability of New Categories of Records
As mandated by the 1996
amendments to the Freedom of Information Act
(E-FOIA), IPS has established a
web site on the Internet located at http://www.foia.state.gov in part to make new categories of records publicly
available. Since its inception
in March 1998, the site has developed into an information-rich direct source of
Department documents and information. The
site encompasses a continuously growing
collection of unique records of international significance, which have been
made available to the public under the FOIA or as special collections. The site averages over 19 million
visitors per month (2 million more per month than last year's report), and
typically experiences a huge increase in the number of visits immediately
following a release of special document collections. By proactively making declassified record collections available
to the requesting public in our electronic reading room, we believe we have
reduced the amount of direct FOIA cases received per year. However, this effect is not verifiable.
Special
interest collections currently total over 100,000 pages in addition to a
continually expanding FOIA library of previously released documents. This year we have added new materials
to the collection. As of January 2004,
all new International Agreements and International Traffic in Arms Regulations
have been added. We have also posted
the Kissinger Telephone Transcripts.
The collection covers September 1973 to December 1976. This is the first release of 5,700 pages of
telephone transcripts that the Department has obtained from the Library of
Congress. Additional pages are being coordinated with other
agencies and will be posted when the coordination has been completed. The transcripts include records of Dr.
Kissinger's role in the Middle East peace process, US-Soviet Union relations,
Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) negotiations, and actions in negotiating
a Vietnam peace treaty.
The
site also provides a number of aids to help users understand the content
of our records and how to access that information; how records are reviewed and
processed for release; why some information may continue to be withheld; and
what users' appeal rights are. The
search engine offers both standard and advanced search capabilities that
include full text retrieval of the documents on the site. In addition, the site provides extensive
links to other sources of Department records or information. In general, IPS has applied technology to
enhance performance and increase the level of satisfaction for our many
customers, who include the general public, the White House, the Congress, other
Federal agencies, the courts, academia, historians, journalists, attorneys,
private interest groups, and the Department's offices and overseas posts.
IX. Costs/FOIA
Staffing
As previously reported, the Department has
committed resources to establish a dedicated staff exclusively for processing
Department of Justice, General Accounting Office, Congressional Committee and
other special document requests. We no
longer need to divert staffing resources from the central FOIA processing
office for these high visibility cases.
With these better-defined staffing roles, we are able to estimate the
resources dedicated to FOIA cases more effectively. We have, therefore, refined both our staffing and total costs
resources for this reporting period and will continue to do so in future
years. The staffing levels reported below
also reflect an estimate of those resources in the decentralized FOIA
processing bureaus.
1. Number of full-time FOIA/PA personnel 134
2. Number of personnel with part-time or occasional FOIA/PA duties (in work-years) 48
3. Total number of personnel (in work-years) 182
A. Totals
Costs (including staff and all resources - estimates)
1. FOIA/PA processing (including appeals) $12,656,689
2. Litigation-related activities $123,156
3. Total costs $ 12,779,845
X. Fees
A. Total amount of fees collected for processing requests $30,767.03
B. Percentage of total costs 0.24%
XI. FOIA
Regulations
The Department's FOIA regulations
have been revised and are located at 22 CFR 171. These can be found directly at the
Government Printing Office's (GPO) website at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html or from links at website at http://foia.state.gov.
The Department's search and
review fees are basic pay plus 16 percent of basic pay. The cost for duplication of records has been
reduced to $.15 per page.
|